@Brendan_Lee Step1: move out of town or be sure yourneighbors have, Step2: dig a hole.
There was a good reason Garum production was strictlyprohibited inside the city limits of ancient Rom.
@DiggingDogFarm I agree with the conclusion there wasn’t muchof choice on the variations in taste on the base Garum but on the quality. Highpriced Garum was made of byzantine tuna and low price production used any Fishof any quality. The lack in consent about whether Garum or Liquamen is theright term is along my own research rather philological.
The writings of the Apicus collection, continuallyedited from 50 AC to 700 AC, often speak of boiling of even frying meat in Liquiamenwhich, and here I agree with J.D Vehling translation (1926), is practicallyimpossible and must indicate a thinned variation of garum by wine or water, asthe correct translation of Liquamen is Broth, Liquid and sauce (stock) but nowherenear to an concentrated extract fish sauce as garum.
@Chris The use of Garum and Liquamen within thedifferent social layers of empire Rome has proven rather the opposite than inthe general assumption provides. Wealthy situated romans with a (at the time) well equippedkitchen and kitchen personal knowing the basics of food preservation were more likelyto surprise their guest with the latest creation of Iiquamen mixtures than the regularRoman who lived to the most part by a nutrition named Puls, a sort of wheat porridgeoften spiced up with pure garum. Meat was the exception, beef had to work aliveand when old it was out of taste, but game was welcomed and often to find at thetable of the patricians.
Yes, concerning the lack of proper foodpreservation Garum was in service for a good part to camouflage any disintegrationof fresh or stored food, which in addition to the subject of food preservation explainsthe wide use of Laser (Silphium) a herbal flower with high antidote characteristics(food poisoning) and the sheer desperate search for a replacement after it becameextinct as the wild grow was not to cultivate.