Notice: apologies if some of the following is not appetizing kitchen talk! I’m not being graphic, but do not proceed if you’re not interested in reading about micro-organisms and diseases. Further, my references here will be quick and dirty, as I haven’t given much time to go digging, sorry! School always gets in the way, doesn’t it? Sigh…
Firstly, while it appears likely that there be merit to the notion of exposure to minor pathogens, the idea really sits on the notion of exposure to blatantly non-pathogenic micro-organisms, which are eradicated easily and unnecessarily by practices of extreme hygiene, such as over-cleaning and the liberal use of antibiotics, and which, under such conditions, may be selected against in favour of major pathogens. The essential goal is to maintain a diverse microbiome to allow proper and full immune development. With respect specifically to the gut flora, a healthy ecosystem will also allow for better digestion.
Here’s a fun little story as an intro to the matter.
The general idea is founded on what's commonly referred to as the "Hygiene Hypothesis," (or, "Old Friends," which I prefer!) which makes the claim that maintenance of the human ecosystem is critical. Though much emphasis is on children, in my view it’s more of a research bias than a matter of exclusivity. The hygiene hypothesis seeks to explain a number of conditions, including in particular allergies and auto-immune diseases, the foundations of which are generally considered to be during childhood (I can’t find a reference at the moment, but I have read about adult rehabilitation of intolerances and allergies through exposure to micro-organisms), but also to overall gut health and therefore systemic immune health. The classic example is of individuals exposed to dirt, farms, and animals in childhood; these individuals, as adults, have an unusually low incidence of asthma and allergies.
Exposure to farming in early life and development of asthma and allergy
Note that breast-feeding, instead of formula-feeding, and vaginal delivery, instead of C-section, are also strongly correlated with improved gut flora. Vaginal delivery seeds the gut flora and is, simply put, definitely not clean and exposes the newborn infant to tons of “friends.”
Fecal Microflora in Healthy Infants Born by Different Methods of Delivery: Permanent Changes in Intestinal Flora After Cesarean Delivery
Analysis of Intestinal Flora Development in Breast-Fed and Formula-Fed Infants by Using Molecular Identification and Detection Methods
With respect to mainstream medical research in adults, faecal transplants and parasite-introduction have shown extraordinary promise in curing such as Crohn's and C. difficile, among others, potentially. For Crohn's, the affected patient is exposed to parasitic worms. For C. diff, faecal transplants are used to encourage a more diverse flora. The foundation for some of the idea behind those experiments has been the evidence that certain conditions simply do not exist, in effect, in regions where hygiene practices are not pristine (read: a majority of developing areas).
Trichuris suis therapy in Crohn’s disease
Stool substitute transplant therapy for the eradication of Clostridium difficile infection
So, that’s some applied research. In the hypothetical realm, this evidence lends credibility to the idea of reducing excessive hygiene tactics. The basic outline follows. In current, developed Western society (for me, that’s Canada), the living conditions have seriously improved from the urban cesspool of industrialization. Vaccinations, medicine, and lower population densities have really made the incidence of dangerous infectious disease approach zero (with emphasis on the word approach). Given this context, we need now to relax our habits and worry less about eliminating every micro-organism lest we face the potential consequences in the form of more and more extreme allergies, intolerances, auto-immune conditions, and possibly cancers. Humans are ecosystems, not singular organisms, and therefore we actively need a diverse microbiome. This is an idea which is much more difficult to test or analyze thoroughly than are isolated cases. But I believe that it has merit, nonetheless.
Easy to read, sometimes too-biased, generally well-referenced launchpads:
http://coolinginflammation.blogspot.com/search/label/hygiene
http://huntgatherlove.com/category/tags/hygiene-hypothesis
Thequestion is; did one grow up in a highly hygienically living environment (1-5year old) or not. In case of yes the immune system already missed out on the adjustments(resistance) to gems and heighten hygiene concerns in the day to day use may applicable.
Contaminationof food and food products are to concern as so far as thesurface of one’s hands is contaminated with about 20.000 germs at any givingtime. Coking at home the fact is rather to neglect as ones Immune systemis “used” to its own germs. Studies haveshown a key board holds a higher amount of bacteria’s than a, sorry.., toiletseat.
Using gloves is common standard in restaurants with good reputation.
@Kevin, ifyou want to go sure try with alcohol. I have a 85% Ethanol (Alcohol 96,4%) and 15%distilled water mixture in a spray dispenser I use on the cutting board, knobsand handles.
For sponges,@Chris has given the best advice.