I hope someone can tell me why the BBQ braised short ribs were so much more toothsome and tender than the red wine braised short ribs (which were stringy by comparison).
I just slow roast-braised boneless short ribs in 2 different side-by-side pans. I usually braise boneless ribs in red wine and vegetables, possibly some beef broth added. This time I decided to compare red wine method to barbecue by roasting them at the same time and temp. I had never tried a BBQ braise, Each pan got about 3# of boneless short ribs, which I cut into 3" chunks and browned stove-top in oil, I reserved the beef and carmelized fennel, elephant garlic, onions, and carrots and split the veggies between the two roasting pans.
For the BBQ ribs, I added about 1.5 c of marinara (store bought simple and organic - no additives) and about 2/3 c of BBQ sauce, (also store bought organic with simple ingredients - no soy sauce (I'm allergic to soy)) and 1/2 c cabernet with the veggies on the bottom and distributed the beef chunks in the pan with the braising liquid and veggies. They were immersed in the thick liquid about 1/2 their depth.
For the red wine version, I added the veggies to the pan and about 2 c of cabernet and then placed the beet. The beef was submersed about 1/3 to 1/2 the way in the braising liquid. I brought the braising liquids to a boil with the beef before putting them in a 275 oven.
I turned the beef chunks occasionally during the next 5 hours before deciding they were sufficiently tender.
The BBQ short ribs were tender and toothsome and could be shredded with a fork. The red wine version were just as they have always been, with an exterior crust and, while tender, also stringy and slightly drier. Certainly they were nowhere near as "toothsome" and succulent as the BBQ.
What gives? Why were they so different? Theories welcome.